Doesn't matter if it was in his physical possession. She asked him for it, he said no, she tried to take it anyway and that is precisely why she's talking that "misunderstanding" and "no ill-will" bullshlt. Because she knows she tried to take the bike from him just like she tried to take his phone, and he didn't let her entitled ass get away with it.

Love how you didn't address anything I said because you know that bltch is lying. No way those kids ran up on her after the fact. They were clearly already there as the timestamps and everything in the video makes clear.


She may have lied on the stand but for no reason, you say Talk about idiot post. You racists are dumb as bricks.

Again you are taking his sisters word for everything. He was the entitled one.

Her lying on the stand ( If she did ) had nothing to do with Till getting murdered. She was harassed and hdr husband found out, her husband was the murderer.

No. I'm using my eyes and common sense. Those kids clearly didn't run up on her. She was lying. The video takes place at 7:24. She scanned the bike at 7:24. Nothing about the demeanor of those kids say they just ran up on her trying to steal a bike from her. Wouldn't even make sense for them to video record themselves stealing from a woman. Get out of here with that obvious bullshlt.


Yes, of course it had something to do with him being murdered. Who the fvvck do you think ID'd Till? Or do you believe her...that he Id'd himself when they brought him to her and he was still trying to sweet talk her right in front of her murderous husband? That's what you believe right? Because a racist like you is dumb enough to believe anything a White person says.

In that original statement, Donham — then Carolyn Bryant — said when her husband, Roy Bryant, brought Till to her, he “was scared but hadn’t been harmed. He didn’t say anything. Roy asked if that was the same one, and I told him it was not the one who had insulted me.”

That is far different from her memoir, “I Am More Than a Wolf Whistle,” which portrays Till as fearless and her as frightened. After she denied Till was the one at the store, she claimed he “flashed me a strange smile and said, ‘Yes, it was me,’ or something to that effect. … He didn’t act … scared in the least.”

Michael Whelan, a psychologist who grew up in Sumner and walked past the 1955 Till trial on the way to school, said he can’t imagine a 14-year-old Black youth from Chicago being dragged off by rednecks in the middle of the night and being unafraid.

The memoir, he said, contains “a whole lot of things that don’t have the ring of complete truth.”
​https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/07/...h-convict-her/


But you believe she didn't ID him, right? Despite the witness saying they heard a female voice ID him. What really happened was he flashed her a little grin...14 years old and completely unafraid, and essentially sealed his own death, right?

BULLSHlT. You should be ashamed of yourself you racist coward. She was complicit in that murder.

This is where you run off, right?

There is zero evidence that Carolyn Bryant ided Till to her husband. The case was investigated numerous times and nobody concluded that.


Nothing shows they ran up her. You are right more likely a pregnant nurse jumped over him and impaled herself on his bike. That is what the sister said..lol
Again done with the argument. Your position is si dumb that it seriousky must be an iq thing. He docked the bike at 7:19 and it was not his bike anymore.

What was the Go Fund Me for? Did she go after him legally?

It's not surprising that a racist idiot like you would defend a woman who obviously ID'd a 14 year old to be murdered and a Citi bike Karen who thought she could just take what she wants....all because they have white skin.

Don't ever call anyone dumb. You braindead racists are as intelligent as a bag of dust. But thank you for always ducking my questions. That shows that even you know you're full of shlt.


Again, the bike was in his physical possession. There is a reason she had "no ill-will" toward kids who she claim tried to strong arm her. Think about that, dumbo.

No, she wouldn't dare. According to their family, they were gearing up just in case he had to defend himself, and also thinking about bringing charges against her and others. The only assault that occurred was her trying to take his phone away, and that was recorded. Otherwise, just as the sentiment was that she would sue everyone who called her Karen, etc. (which certainly won't happen now that the kid's side of things came out), they may sue everyone who called him a thug, thief, etc.

I'm hoping he doesn't have to give that money to any lawyers and can just pocket it all, to be honest.

What did she do that is so bad in comparison to telling her her baby is going to come out rtarded after stealing a bike from her?

Maybe that's normal behavior in w.e crack head town you're from but in the civilized world that is hood behavior..

There is no evidence that she ided him.